From: | Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka(at)iki(dot)fi> |
---|---|
To: | Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se> |
Cc: | pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Error code missing for "wrong length of inner sequence" error |
Date: | 2020-10-02 11:44:54 |
Message-ID: | 04615cd9-23b8-c1a7-40e2-d1be9451138d@iki.fi |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 01/10/2020 14:21, Daniel Gustafsson wrote:
>> On 1 Oct 2020, at 12:54, Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka(at)iki(dot)fi> wrote:
>
>> Most checks when converting between SQL and Python types use the PLy_elog() function, which uses the genericc ERRCODE_EXTERNAL_ROUTINE_EXCEPTION error code, but I think ERRCODE_ARRAY_SUBSCRIPT_ERROR is better.
>
> On that note, wouldn't the dimension check errors in PLySequence_ToArray be
> just as well off using normal ereport()'s? Only one of them seem to error out
> in a way that could propagate an error from Python to postgres.
Yes, you are right. I was going to say that we are not very consistent
on when to use ereport() and when PLy_elog() in general, but looking
closer, we are. Outside the array-conversion functions, PLy_elog() is
only used when a Python C API call fails, and ereport() is used otherwise.
Patch attached.
- Heikki
Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
---|---|---|
0001-Tidy-up-error-reporting-when-converting-PL-Python-ar.patch | text/x-patch | 2.8 KB |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Amit Langote | 2020-10-02 11:56:32 | a misbehavior of partition row movement (?) |
Previous Message | tsunakawa.takay@fujitsu.com | 2020-10-02 09:20:32 | RE: Transactions involving multiple postgres foreign servers, take 2 |