From: | "Hiroshi Saito" <z-saito(at)guitar(dot)ocn(dot)ne(dot)jp> |
---|---|
To: | "Dave Page" <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org>, "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | "Magnus Hagander" <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: OSSP can be used in the windows environment now! |
Date: | 2008-03-01 10:14:44 |
Message-ID: | 045201c87b85$12d624f0$1601a8c0@IBMC9A0F63B40D |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Hi.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
> I'd like somebody to close the loop with upstream OSSP authors first.
> If they don't see anything broken about the makefile, and indicate
> intention to incorporate it in some future release, then it's okay to
> put it in our CVS temporarily. If they don't like it then we'd better
> understand why.
>
> There's also the possibility that they put out a release including it
> next week, in which case we hardly need it in our CVS.
Um, I was hesitating the proposal by the reason which is not beautiful.
However, it turns out that it is solvable by a little working hours.
Therefore, It is due for me to do the work.I think, It is because of the
wonderfulness of PostgreSQL. But, since MinGW+GCC can already be
used, the problem is whether to provide by pginstaller. then, we have
intension necessity in it. Then, An objection will not realize it.....
Regards,
Hiroshi Saito
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2008-03-01 21:11:12 | Re: "could not open relation 1663/16384/16584: No such file or directory" in a specific combination of transactions with temp tables |
Previous Message | Florian G. Pflug | 2008-03-01 01:02:33 | Re: Read-ahead and parallelism in redo recovery |