[pgAdmin III] #165: Maintenance work blocks UI - use separate connection?

From: "pgAdmin Trac" <trac(at)code(dot)pgadmin(dot)org>
To:
Cc: pgadmin-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: [pgAdmin III] #165: Maintenance work blocks UI - use separate connection?
Date: 2010-04-06 21:22:32
Message-ID: 044.734509f4a80d9f276f86610ade9c0b3e@code.pgadmin.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgadmin-hackers

#165: Maintenance work blocks UI - use separate connection?
----------------------+-----------------------------------------------------
Reporter: mha | Owner: dpage
Type: bug | Status: new
Priority: critical | Milestone:
Component: pgadmin | Version: 1.10
Keywords: | Platform: all
----------------------+-----------------------------------------------------
Am I reading things right that we actually execute things from the
maintenance dialog (like VACUUM) on a separate thread, to keep the UI
responsive? Yet, it keeps hanging when we do that. My guess is that
we're "using up" the connection we have, and as soon as somebody else
needs access to the connection to do things like refresh tree
information, we hang and wait. Or am I reading this wrong?

If we are, should we perhaps consider firing off these jobs on a
separate connection?

--
Ticket URL: <http://code.pgadmin.org/trac/ticket/165>
pgAdmin III <http://code.pgadmin.org/trac/>
pgAdmin III

Responses

Browse pgadmin-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message pgAdmin Trac 2010-04-06 21:22:43 Re: [pgAdmin III] #165: Maintenance work blocks UI - use separate connection?
Previous Message Guillaume Lelarge 2010-04-06 20:59:09 Re: Missing non-login roles in properties dialog