From: | Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se> |
---|---|
To: | "wangzk(dot)fnstxz(at)fujitsu(dot)com" <wangzk(dot)fnstxz(at)fujitsu(dot)com> |
Cc: | "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Doc: Fixed the result of the bit_count example |
Date: | 2021-07-29 09:35:54 |
Message-ID: | 04205623-A800-42E9-A52C-EB0DE2F963CE@yesql.se |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
> On 29 Jul 2021, at 11:23, wangzk(dot)fnstxz(at)fujitsu(dot)com wrote:
>
> Hello:
>
> There is a small problem with the documentation for the previously added SQL function “bit_count”.
>
> In the doc, (https://www.postgresql.org/docs/14/functions-binarystring.html)
> “bit_count('\x1234567890'::bytea)” result is "31" , but the actual result is "15".
>
> Similar problems have been fixed in test file (commit: ebedd0c78fc51c293abe56e99a18c67af14da0c9), but the doc has not been modified.
Good catch, with the default value of standard_conforming_strings the result is
indeed 15 and should be updated to reflect that. I'll apply this shortly
backpatched to 14 where bit_count was introduced.
--
Daniel Gustafsson https://vmware.com/
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Andrew Dunstan | 2021-07-29 10:18:54 | Re: Out-of-memory error reports in libpq |
Previous Message | wangzk.fnstxz@fujitsu.com | 2021-07-29 09:23:46 | Doc: Fixed the result of the bit_count example |