From: | Kenneth Gonsalves <lawgon(at)thenilgiris(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Richard Huxton <dev(at)archonet(dot)com> |
Cc: | pgsql-sql(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: mysql set datatype |
Date: | 2004-12-13 13:43:25 |
Message-ID: | 04121319132500.06834@thenilgiris.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-sql |
On Monday 13 December 2004 06:55 pm, Richard Huxton wrote:
> Kenneth Gonsalves wrote:
> > hi,
> > how does one replicate the myql 'set' datatype in pg? i tried using
> > 'check', but apparently there is much more to this
>
> You could use a bit-string if you are just tracking set membership, but
> that doesn't exactly duplicate the behaviour. It should be
> straightforward enough to write some support functions and just use a
> text type, but that'd use a lot more storage.
>
> Of course, another table is the accepted way of doing this relationally.
> Are there any particular features you need, or are you just porting an
> application from Mysql?
just porting
kg
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Christopher Browne | 2004-12-13 16:35:07 | Re: postgressql.org |
Previous Message | Richard Huxton | 2004-12-13 13:25:48 | Re: mysql set datatype |