From: | Tomas Vondra <tomas(dot)vondra(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Cc: | Petr Jelinek <petr(dot)jelinek(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Petr Jelinek <petr(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, John Gorman <johngorman2(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Subject: | Re: PATCH: two slab-like memory allocators |
Date: | 2017-02-27 17:55:21 |
Message-ID: | 03cc6ca8-bdd8-b53e-93e4-757cd80e1ce8@2ndquadrant.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 02/27/2017 04:07 PM, Andres Freund wrote:
>
>
> On February 27, 2017 6:14:20 AM PST, Tomas Vondra
> <tomas(dot)vondra(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
>> On 02/27/2017 01:02 PM, Andres Freund wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> On 2017-02-27 03:17:32 -0800, Andres Freund wrote:
>>>> I'll work on getting slab committed first, and then review /
>>>> edit / commit generation.c later. One first note there is that
>>>> I'm
>> wondering
>>>> if generation.c is a too generic filename.
>>>
>>> And pushed slab and its usage. Will have a look at generation.c
>>> tomorrow.
>>>
>>> - Andres
>>>
>>
>> Gah. I don't want to annoy person who just committed my patch, but
>> can you give more time when asking for feedback? I mean, sending a
>> modified
>>
>> patch on Friday midnight, and committing on Monday noon does not
>> really
>>
>> give much time to look at it.
>
> Hm. The changes IMO weren't controversial (or surprising -most of
> them I had announced previously); I announced that I would when
> posting the review that I'd push the patch later that weekend. If I
> hadn't been tired after doing the review/editing I'd have just pushed
> right then and there. It's hard to find time and attention, so not
> introducing a week of feedback time is quite worthwhile. I listed
> the changes I made primarily for posterities sake. Most if not all
> committers make editorializing changed around commit, so that's not
> just me.
>
> If you specifically want I can try to give you more time to look at
> an edited patch, but that'll mean things move slower. I won't
> promise not to make minor changed just before commit either way, I
> always do another round of review just before push.
>
I also agree the changes are not particularly controversial, but then
why to ask for comments at all? I'm OK with a committer making final
tweaks and pushing it without asking, but if you ask for comments, let's
give people time to actually respond.
I agree introducing weeks of delays would be silly, but I'm not asking
for that. I'm perfectly fine with two days for feedback, as long as it's
not a weekend + half of Monday.
regards
--
Tomas Vondra http://www.2ndQuadrant.com
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tomas Vondra | 2017-02-27 18:20:56 | Re: Poor memory context performance in large hash joins |
Previous Message | Simon Riggs | 2017-02-27 17:51:18 | Re: gitlab post-mortem: pg_basebackup waiting for checkpoint |