From: | "claus" <ch(at)greenmail(dot)ch> |
---|---|
To: | "Adam H(dot) Pendleton" <fmonkey(at)fmonkey(dot)net>, "Andreas Pflug" <pgadmin(at)pse-consulting(dot)de> |
Cc: | <pgadmin-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Some remarks to pgadmin III |
Date: | 2003-08-15 15:39:53 |
Message-ID: | 03c201c36343$790909e0$8701a8c0@descom.local |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgadmin-hackers |
Is there still some hope :-))
Adam H. Pendleton wrote:
> I assume when you say that sorting the rows would require a re-query,
> you are referring to a new SQL statement with a "ORDER BY" clause. I
> think what he's asking for is perfectly do-able without a new query.
> Since the rows are stored in a grid control of some sort, then you
> should be able to sort the rows using the function of that grid control
> itself. This sort would have *no* impact on the actual data, where it
> is in the database, etc. I would imagine that this sort of this would
> be possible only if the wxWindows control used to display the data
> supported it. I will do some reasearch and see if it can be done.
That is when I said that data is around in some form.
I just tested a table with 13000 entries ...
after "refreshing" it **realy** seems to me all data is on my PC.
When scrolling there is absolutely **no** freeze, flicker or
other indication of data being fetched in a lazy way.
Also the sliders of the grid indicate perfectly where are in the
data ... ok that might be done using a "total row count" value.
For those who worked with tools doing on demand row fetch.
(I think Delphi 3 Datamanger and Free Toad for Oracle)
they know what I mean.
Regards, Claus
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Andreas Pflug | 2003-08-15 15:46:09 | Re: Some remarks to pgadmin III |
Previous Message | Adam H. Pendleton | 2003-08-15 15:31:22 | Re: Some remarks to pgadmin III |