Re: 10 missing features

From: "mark" <dvlhntr(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: "'Linos'" <info(at)linos(dot)es>, <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: 10 missing features
Date: 2011-04-25 14:29:43
Message-ID: 03ab01cc0355$39738fc0$ac5aaf40$@com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

> -----Original Message-----
> From: pgsql-general-owner(at)postgresql(dot)org [mailto:pgsql-general-
> owner(at)postgresql(dot)org] On Behalf Of Linos
> Sent: Monday, April 25, 2011 2:42 AM
> To: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
> Subject: [GENERAL] 10 missing features
>
> Hi all,
> only want to link this blog post
> http://blog.kimiensoftware.com/2011/04/top-10-missing-postgresql-
> features , i
> think he may have any good points.
>

I think this is flame bait for rules based / query hints stuff all over
again.

Did anyone else notice how most of his top then comes back to "bad plans".
Either the planner is really bad all the time and I never knew it or we are
way overblowing things.

One or two of his points are on my list as well, but as far as a TOP 10
missing features that PG "needs" his probably aren't anywhere close to what
the majority of people are in need of.

-Mark

>
> Miguel Angel.
>
> --
> Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org)
> To make changes to your subscription:
> http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andrew Sullivan 2011-04-25 14:48:36 Re: 10 missing features
Previous Message Adrian Klaver 2011-04-25 14:23:50 Re: pipe line error (psql command)