| From: | "Rod Taylor" <rbt(at)zort(dot)ca> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | "Dave Page" <dpage(at)vale-housing(dot)co(dot)uk>, <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Operator Comments |
| Date: | 2002-05-13 01:53:53 |
| Message-ID: | 03a701c1fa21$09522e10$0f02000a@jester |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
> "Rod Taylor" <rbt(at)zort(dot)ca> writes:
> > Looks like CommentOperator goes to quite a bit of work (5 lines)
to
> > accomplish fetching the procedure and states specifically it's not
a
> > bug.
>
> I can see the value in having the function comment shown when there
is
> no comment specifically for the operator ... but perhaps that ought
to
> be implemented in the client requesters, rather than wired into the
> catalog representation.
Agreed. If no-one objects, I'll submit a patch which makes comment on
operator actually comment on the operator.
It'll also coalesce(operator comment, function comment) in psql.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Christopher Kings-Lynne | 2002-05-13 02:17:07 | Re: TRUNCATE |
| Previous Message | Hiroshi Inoue | 2002-05-13 00:53:13 | Re: Nested transactions RFC |