Re: Assembling "top features" list for beta announcement

From: Justin Clift <justin(at)postgresql(dot)org>
To: Josh Berkus <josh(at)berkus(dot)org>
Cc: Michael Banck <michael(dot)banck(at)credativ(dot)de>, Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)bowt(dot)ie>, PostgreSQL Advocacy <pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Subject: Re: Assembling "top features" list for beta announcement
Date: 2017-04-08 19:53:12
Message-ID: 03E47681-FEF2-4BFE-990E-DBDE02412EF8@postgresql.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-advocacy

On 8 Apr 2017, at 20:48, Josh Berkus <josh(at)berkus(dot)org> wrote:
<snip>
> From a PR standpoint, 5 is the absolute max, and 3 is better. Really,
> the ideal situation is a set of features which can be closely tied
> together around a simple theme.

* Replication
* Performance
* Reliability

?

+ Justin

--
"My grandfather once told me that there are two kinds of people: those
who work and those who take the credit. He told me to try to be in the
first group; there was less competition there."
- Indira Gandhi

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-advocacy by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Josh Berkus 2017-04-08 20:26:33 Re: Assembling "top features" list for beta announcement
Previous Message Josh Berkus 2017-04-08 19:48:23 Re: Assembling "top features" list for beta announcement