From: | "Dave Page" <dpage(at)vale-housing(dot)co(dot)uk> |
---|---|
To: | "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | "Stergios Zissakis" <szis(at)intranet(dot)gr>, <pgsql-odbc(at)postgresql(dot)org>, "Kostas Lykiardopoulos" <klyk(at)intranet(dot)gr>, "Dimitris Pantermalis" <dpant(at)intranet(dot)gr> |
Subject: | Re: Mutli-threading and performance of ODBC |
Date: | 2004-03-09 17:04:38 |
Message-ID: | 03AF4E498C591348A42FC93DEA9661B889F623@mail.vale-housing.co.uk |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-odbc |
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Tom Lane [mailto:tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us]
> Sent: 09 March 2004 16:58
> To: Dave Page
> Cc: Stergios Zissakis; pgsql-odbc(at)postgresql(dot)org; Kostas
> Lykiardopoulos; Dimitris Pantermalis
> Subject: Re: [ODBC] Mutli-threading and performance of ODBC
>
> "Dave Page" <dpage(at)vale-housing(dot)co(dot)uk> writes:
> > It's not in unixODBC, it's in psqlODBC (and the above
> should have read
> > 7.1).
>
> Um. The complainant was saying he was using unixODBC, which
> I take to mean unixODBC's embedded Postgres driver. I had
> not realized that the latter is out of date. We ought to see
> what can be done about syncing up, or perhaps removing the
> embedded driver from unixODBC altogether.
I thought unixODBC was merely the driver manager - didn't realise they
had some drivers as well, hence why I assumed the problem was with
psqlODBC.
Regards, Dave.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2004-03-09 17:11:16 | Re: Mutli-threading and performance of ODBC |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2004-03-09 16:58:29 | Re: Mutli-threading and performance of ODBC |