From: | "Dave Page" <dpage(at)vale-housing(dot)co(dot)uk> |
---|---|
To: | "Vince Vielhaber" <vev(at)michvhf(dot)com>, "mlw" <pgsql(at)mohawksoft(dot)com> |
Cc: | <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: PostgreSQL site, put up or shut up? |
Date: | 2003-01-07 23:05:06 |
Message-ID: | 03AF4E498C591348A42FC93DEA9661B88561@mail.vale-housing.co.uk |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Vince Vielhaber [mailto:vev(at)michvhf(dot)com]
> Sent: 07 January 2003 22:47
> To: mlw
> Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org; Marc G. Fournier
> Subject: Re: [HACKERS] PostgreSQL site, put up or shut up?
>
>
> On Tue, 7 Jan 2003, mlw wrote:
>
> > This is a serious inquiry, very serious. People are
> complaining about
> > ads.
> >
> > What do we need in the form of equipment, bandwidth, etc.
>
> FTP is just over 800MB, plan for growth.
> WEB is just over 90MB, can't tell you what to plan for there.
>
> On www/ftp.us I don't even notice the bandwidth, it's less
> than the normal traffic for Pop4 (an ISP) and the streaming
> audio uses up even more than that.
Disk is cheap, it's the bandwidth that costs. A cursory look at the new
portal (which is on a new machine on it's own) is showing about 1Gb
since going live on Saturday/Sunday. Of course, these are not just bits
of webspace, they are BSD boxes to which we have complete access. There
are all sorts of things being run on them - CVS, docbook, distribution
builds, Gborg, PostgreSQL, Majordomo, Horde...
Regards, Dave.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2003-01-07 23:07:18 | MOVE LAST: why? |
Previous Message | Greg Copeland | 2003-01-07 23:02:17 | Re: PostgreSQL site, put up or shut up? |