| From: | "Dave Page" <dpage(at)vale-housing(dot)co(dot)uk> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org>, "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | <pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: projects.postgresql.net |
| Date: | 2004-02-02 16:23:16 |
| Message-ID: | 03AF4E498C591348A42FC93DEA9661B87206CF@mail.vale-housing.co.uk |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-www |
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Marc G. Fournier [mailto:scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org]
> Sent: 02 February 2004 15:48
> To: Tom Lane
> Cc: pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org
> Subject: Re: [pgsql-www] projects.postgresql.net
>
>
> We can use .org, it just means that its more difficult to
> automate the process of setting up a new project, since DNS
> would have to be modified for each new one ...
Not to mention that we may have problems if someone registers a project
in a generic name that we later want to use for some reason (for
example, someone starts a search engine project and simply calls it
'search').
I would vote to keep it all in it's own domain.
On that note though Marc, any thoughts on automatically adding such
sites to the indexer?
Regards, Dave.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2004-02-02 16:23:19 | Re: Archives cleaned up ... but not regenerated yet ... |
| Previous Message | Dave Page | 2004-02-02 16:18:32 | Re: Archives cleaned up ... but not regenerated yet ... |