From: | "Dave Page" <dpage(at)vale-housing(dot)co(dot)uk> |
---|---|
To: | "Robert Treat" <xzilla(at)users(dot)sourceforge(dot)net> |
Cc: | "Alexey Borzov" <borz_off(at)cs(dot)msu(dot)su>, <pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Todo for 'portal', programmers perspective |
Date: | 2004-01-15 16:38:40 |
Message-ID: | 03AF4E498C591348A42FC93DEA9661B8720497@mail.vale-housing.co.uk |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-www |
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Robert Treat [mailto:xzilla(at)users(dot)sourceforge(dot)net]
> Sent: 15 January 2004 16:31
> To: Dave Page
> Cc: Alexey Borzov; pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org
> Subject: Re: [pgsql-www] Todo for 'portal', programmers perspective
>
> >
> > The DB schema is not in the CVS at present. I'm not convinced it
> > should
> > be: Developers working elsewhere will need data as well as schema,
> > however, the data is purposefully not included as it makes
> the dump a
> > very large file.
> >
> > Happy to hear suggestions for handling that little problem...
> >
>
> ISTM development no on the server is orders of magnitude
> harder without having a database available to hit against.
'Tis also difficult without any content to work with. Maybe we should
have a link to a nightly dump of the schema only and the schema + data?
That way, developers can grab whichever they want.
Thoughts?
Regards, Dave.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Alexey Borzov | 2004-01-15 16:56:47 | Re: Todo for 'portal', programmers perspective |
Previous Message | Andreas Grabmller | 2004-01-15 16:24:25 | Re: Todo for 'portal', programmers perspective |