Re: Todo for 'portal', programmers perspective

From: "Dave Page" <dpage(at)vale-housing(dot)co(dot)uk>
To: "Robert Treat" <xzilla(at)users(dot)sourceforge(dot)net>
Cc: "Alexey Borzov" <borz_off(at)cs(dot)msu(dot)su>, <pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Todo for 'portal', programmers perspective
Date: 2004-01-15 16:38:40
Message-ID: 03AF4E498C591348A42FC93DEA9661B8720497@mail.vale-housing.co.uk
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-www

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Robert Treat [mailto:xzilla(at)users(dot)sourceforge(dot)net]
> Sent: 15 January 2004 16:31
> To: Dave Page
> Cc: Alexey Borzov; pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org
> Subject: Re: [pgsql-www] Todo for 'portal', programmers perspective
>
> >
> > The DB schema is not in the CVS at present. I'm not convinced it
> > should
> > be: Developers working elsewhere will need data as well as schema,
> > however, the data is purposefully not included as it makes
> the dump a
> > very large file.
> >
> > Happy to hear suggestions for handling that little problem...
> >
>
> ISTM development no on the server is orders of magnitude
> harder without having a database available to hit against.

'Tis also difficult without any content to work with. Maybe we should
have a link to a nightly dump of the schema only and the schema + data?
That way, developers can grab whichever they want.

Thoughts?

Regards, Dave.

Browse pgsql-www by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alexey Borzov 2004-01-15 16:56:47 Re: Todo for 'portal', programmers perspective
Previous Message Andreas Grabmller 2004-01-15 16:24:25 Re: Todo for 'portal', programmers perspective