From: | "Dave Page" <dpage(at)vale-housing(dot)co(dot)uk> |
---|---|
To: | "Andreas Pflug" <pgadmin(at)pse-consulting(dot)de> |
Cc: | <pgadmin-support(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: pgAdmin bug? snapshot |
Date: | 2003-11-19 15:44:52 |
Message-ID: | 03AF4E498C591348A42FC93DEA9661B8720026@mail.vale-housing.co.uk |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgadmin-support |
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Andreas Pflug [mailto:pgadmin(at)pse-consulting(dot)de]
> Sent: 19 November 2003 15:40
> To: Dave Page
> Cc: pgadmin-support(at)postgresql(dot)org
> Subject: Re: [pgadmin-support] pgAdmin bug? snapshot
>
> Dave Page wrote:
>
> Sounds as if we could enable *all* set variables for this. So
> there would be a database default, user default (both stored
> in the backend), and a query tool default.
Do we really want to _store_ changes made in the query tool? I can just
see ppl forgetting that they changed something in there some time ago
and then not understanding why their query is different in production.
Regards, Dave
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Dave Page | 2003-11-19 15:57:37 | Re: pgAdmin bug? snapshot |
Previous Message | Dave Page | 2003-11-19 15:42:31 | Re: pgAdmin bug? snapshot |