Re: wxGTK2ud BuildRequires dependencies

From: "Dave Page" <dpage(at)vale-housing(dot)co(dot)uk>
To: "Adam H(dot) Pendleton" <fmonkey(at)fmonkey(dot)net>, <jm(at)poure(dot)com>
Cc: "Andreas Pflug" <pgadmin(at)pse-consulting(dot)de>, <pgadmin-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: wxGTK2ud BuildRequires dependencies
Date: 2003-11-18 13:55:06
Message-ID: 03AF4E498C591348A42FC93DEA9661B872000A@mail.vale-housing.co.uk
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgadmin-hackers

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Adam H. Pendleton [mailto:fmonkey(at)fmonkey(dot)net]
> Sent: 18 November 2003 13:30
> To: jm(at)poure(dot)com
> Cc: Dave Page; Andreas Pflug; pgadmin-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
> Subject: Re: [pgadmin-hackers] wxGTK2ud BuildRequires dependencies
>
> Jean-Michel POURE wrote:
>
> >- Contributions to the wxWindows project will not be
> licensed under a
> >license (such as the "BSD-style" license) that allows
> private ports to
> >be distributed.
> >
> >
> This sounds quite ominous considering that we do exactly that:
> distribute a private port of wxWindows. Also, depending on
> the license they choose to distribute wxWindows under, could
> it cause problems with our product (i.e. GPL vs LGPL)?

No. They cannot retroactively change the licence on what we already
have.

Regards, Dave.

Responses

Browse pgadmin-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Adam H. Pendleton 2003-11-18 15:09:43 Re: wxGTK2ud BuildRequires dependencies
Previous Message Jean-Michel POURE 2003-11-18 13:49:02 Re: wxGTK2ud BuildRequires dependencies