From: | "Dave Page" <dpage(at)vale-housing(dot)co(dot)uk> |
---|---|
To: | "Adam H(dot) Pendleton" <fmonkey(at)fmonkey(dot)net>, <jm(at)poure(dot)com> |
Cc: | "Andreas Pflug" <pgadmin(at)pse-consulting(dot)de>, <pgadmin-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: wxGTK2ud BuildRequires dependencies |
Date: | 2003-11-18 13:55:06 |
Message-ID: | 03AF4E498C591348A42FC93DEA9661B872000A@mail.vale-housing.co.uk |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgadmin-hackers |
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Adam H. Pendleton [mailto:fmonkey(at)fmonkey(dot)net]
> Sent: 18 November 2003 13:30
> To: jm(at)poure(dot)com
> Cc: Dave Page; Andreas Pflug; pgadmin-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
> Subject: Re: [pgadmin-hackers] wxGTK2ud BuildRequires dependencies
>
> Jean-Michel POURE wrote:
>
> >- Contributions to the wxWindows project will not be
> licensed under a
> >license (such as the "BSD-style" license) that allows
> private ports to
> >be distributed.
> >
> >
> This sounds quite ominous considering that we do exactly that:
> distribute a private port of wxWindows. Also, depending on
> the license they choose to distribute wxWindows under, could
> it cause problems with our product (i.e. GPL vs LGPL)?
No. They cannot retroactively change the licence on what we already
have.
Regards, Dave.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Adam H. Pendleton | 2003-11-18 15:09:43 | Re: wxGTK2ud BuildRequires dependencies |
Previous Message | Jean-Michel POURE | 2003-11-18 13:49:02 | Re: wxGTK2ud BuildRequires dependencies |