Re: Update

From: "Dave Page" <dpage(at)vale-housing(dot)co(dot)uk>
To: "Adam H(dot) Pendleton" <fmonkey(at)fmonkey(dot)net>, "pgadmin-hackers" <pgadmin-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Update
Date: 2003-10-07 07:10:43
Message-ID: 03AF4E498C591348A42FC93DEA9661B844B763@mail.vale-housing.co.uk
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgadmin-hackers

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Adam H. Pendleton [mailto:fmonkey(at)fmonkey(dot)net]
> Sent: 06 October 2003 16:07
> To: pgadmin-hackers
> Subject: [pgadmin-hackers] Update
>
>
> Hello everyone! I've been out of town for the weekend, so I
> wasn't able
> to work on any pgAdmin stuff while I was gone. I'm going to get back
> into it, so I wanted to make sure that I've got everything on
> my to-do list:
>
> *) Fix -DSSL compilation problem
> *) Make static build more static
> *) Fix J-M's xpm include problem
> *) RH 7.3 SRPM building
> *) Mac OS X port
>
> Did I miss anything?

Hi Adam,

It would be cool if there were a generic mechanism we could use to write
the version number into scripts 'n' stuff at configure time. The would
certainly make my life easier with various build scripts.

Regards, Dave.

Responses

  • Re: Update at 2003-10-07 12:36:55 from Adam H. Pendleton

Browse pgadmin-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Dave Page 2003-10-07 07:24:52 Re: gcc ignoring defined macros?
Previous Message Andreas Pflug 2003-10-06 22:20:07 Re: CVS compile error