| From: | "Dave Page" <dpage(at)vale-housing(dot)co(dot)uk> |
|---|---|
| To: | "John K(dot) Herreshoff" <jkherr(at)centurytel(dot)net>, <pgsql-odbc(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: FUD!! ODBC will not be supported by Microsoft in the future |
| Date: | 2003-09-30 12:26:32 |
| Message-ID: | 03AF4E498C591348A42FC93DEA9661B83AF269@mail.vale-housing.co.uk |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-odbc |
> -----Original Message-----
> From: John K. Herreshoff [mailto:jkherr(at)centurytel(dot)net]
> Sent: 30 September 2003 12:22
> To: pgsql-odbc(at)postgresql(dot)org
> Subject: Re: [ODBC] FUD!! ODBC will not be supported by
> Microsoft in the future
>
>
> Relaxin wrote:
>
> <snip>
> >
> > Plus, Postgresql's ODBC has some serious problems, I
> wouldn't trust in
> > production on Windows anyhow. :)
> >
> > Thanks
>
> That's a red herring. Can you be more specific? I've not
> seen trouble with PG ODBC, but I'm not beating on it yet with
> any great force...
Well I am, on 50+ systems and haven't had any major issues since Byron
busted a gut fixing things back around 1997/1998.
pgAdmin II seems to use it just fine as well...
Regards, Dave.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Stephen Frost | 2003-09-30 13:49:30 | Re: FUD!! ODBC will not be supported by Microsoft in the future |
| Previous Message | Steve Lutz | 2003-09-30 12:04:37 | Re: FUD!! ODBC will not be supported by Microsoft in the future |