From: | "Dave Page" <dpage(at)vale-housing(dot)co(dot)uk> |
---|---|
To: | "Tatsuo Ishii" <t-ishii(at)sra(dot)co(dot)jp>, <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Win32 Powerfail testing |
Date: | 2003-03-05 12:32:12 |
Message-ID: | 03AF4E498C591348A42FC93DEA9661B8259D03@mail.vale-housing.co.uk |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Tatsuo Ishii [mailto:t-ishii(at)sra(dot)co(dot)jp]
> Sent: 05 March 2003 02:23
> To: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
> Subject: [HACKERS] Win32 Powerfail testing
>
> So far we found interesting facts. Our Win32 port passes his
> test in most cases. However if power of the machine is turned
> off right after (10 to 20 seconds) the Checkpoint has been
> made, it does not passes his test. So we are thinking that
> there is someting wrong with the checkpoint implementaion for
> Win32 port, which is essentially same as Jan's
> implementation. i.e. using _flushall() instead of sync(). We
> were looking for a fix or an alternative implementaion of
> sync() without success.
Hi Tatsuo,
Does this help:
http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;66052
Regards, Dave.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Merlin Moncure | 2003-03-05 13:15:53 | Re: XML ouput for psql |
Previous Message | Marc G. Fournier | 2003-03-05 06:00:47 | test to be ignored ... |