Re: Windows Build System - My final thoughts

From: "Dave Page" <dpage(at)vale-housing(dot)co(dot)uk>
To: "Justin Clift" <justin(at)postgresql(dot)org>, "Bruce Momjian" <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: "Lamar Owen" <lamar(dot)owen(at)wgcr(dot)org>, "PostgreSQL-development" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Windows Build System - My final thoughts
Date: 2003-02-02 19:54:13
Message-ID: 03AF4E498C591348A42FC93DEA9661B8259BAB@mail.vale-housing.co.uk
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Justin Clift [mailto:justin(at)postgresql(dot)org]
> Sent: 02 February 2003 15:01
> To: Bruce Momjian
> Cc: Lamar Owen; PostgreSQL-development
> Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Windows Build System - My final thoughts
>
> >> Hey, if we make a really
> >>bad impression with the first release, then there might not be the
> >>quadruple-zillion Windows PG users after all. If that
> sounds like a
> >>good idea, maybe adding the GUC variables "random_query_delay"
> >>(minutes), "crash_how_often" (seconds), and
> "reboot_plus_corrupt_please"
> >>(true/false)?
> >
> >
> > What we need is for the backend to query postgresql.org to
> set those
> > parameters, so we can control how many Win32 users adopt
> PostgreSQL.
> > :-)
>
> "All your [data] base belong to us" ?

I'll get working on some php code if we're happy to use http for the
comms ;-)

Regards, Dave.

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2003-02-02 19:59:51 Last call for 7.3.2
Previous Message Kurt Roeckx 2003-02-02 19:35:20 pg_hba.conf hostmask.