From: | "Dave Page" <dpage(at)vale-housing(dot)co(dot)uk> |
---|---|
To: | "Greg Copeland" <greg(at)copelandconsulting(dot)net>, "Justin Clift" <justin(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Cc: | "PostgresSQL Hackers Mailing List" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Odd website behavior... |
Date: | 2003-01-31 20:44:45 |
Message-ID: | 03AF4E498C591348A42FC93DEA9661B8259B9D@mail.vale-housing.co.uk |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Greg Copeland [mailto:greg(at)copelandconsulting(dot)net]
> Sent: 31 January 2003 19:45
> To: Dave Page
> Cc: PostgresSQL Hackers Mailing List
> Subject: RE: [HACKERS] Odd website behavior...
>
>
> > Or do you mean the old Google one?
> >
> > Regards, Dave.
>
>
> I'm going to guess and say, "yes". Since the "old google
> one" is the only search mechanism that I've seen. I'm
> surprised to read that there is another mechanism.
Yes, it;s only a few days old - part of the ongoing website overhaul.
> Perhaps the "old google one" can be done away with as
> your results page has a nice look and certainly was much
> more effective.
Justin? We can write a techdocs styled search/results page quite easily
if you like that will use the same database, and filter to techdocs only
if that's preferred. It would be nice to get rid of Google.
Regards, Dave.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | mlw | 2003-01-31 20:46:20 | Re: [mail] Re: Windows Build System |
Previous Message | Dave Page | 2003-01-31 20:36:44 | Win32 port powerfail testing |