From: | "Dave Page" <dpage(at)vale-housing(dot)co(dot)uk> |
---|---|
To: | "Vince Vielhaber" <vev(at)michvhf(dot)com> |
Cc: | "Katie Ward" <kward(at)peerdirect(dot)com>, "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, "Curtis Faith" <curtis(at)galtcapital(dot)com>, <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: [mail] Re: Windows Build System |
Date: | 2003-01-29 17:16:29 |
Message-ID: | 03AF4E498C591348A42FC93DEA9661B8259B74@mail.vale-housing.co.uk |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Vince Vielhaber [mailto:vev(at)michvhf(dot)com]
> Sent: 29 January 2003 17:13
> To: Dave Page
> Cc: Katie Ward; Tom Lane; Curtis Faith; pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
> Subject: RE: [mail] Re: [HACKERS] Windows Build System
>
>
> On Wed, 29 Jan 2003, Dave Page wrote:
>
> > > The code's been available for what a week or two? Do you
> actually
> > > think that can be considered conclusive by any standard?
> >
> > Public beta testing (but closed source) has been going on for some
> > months.
>
> So you've been running these unscientific tests you're
> telling us about being so successful for "some months"?
No, I've spent a few days here and there on it, and left things running
for the odd couple of days. I'm certainly not the only tester though.
Regards, Dave.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Vince Vielhaber | 2003-01-29 17:21:42 | Re: [mail] Re: Windows Build System |
Previous Message | Dave Page | 2003-01-29 17:14:52 | Re: [mail] Re: Windows Build System |