Re: Foreign key wierdness

From: "Dave Page" <dpage(at)vale-housing(dot)co(dot)uk>
To: "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, "Didier Moens" <moensd(at)xs4all(dot)be>
Cc: "PostgreSQL Hackers Mailing List" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Foreign key wierdness
Date: 2003-01-21 08:26:48
Message-ID: 03AF4E498C591348A42FC93DEA9661B8259AEB@mail.vale-housing.co.uk
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Tom Lane [mailto:tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us]
> Sent: 20 January 2003 21:28
> To: Didier Moens
> Cc: Dave Page; PostgreSQL Hackers Mailing List
> Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Foreign key wierdness
>
>
> Didier Moens <moensd(at)xs4all(dot)be> writes:
> > I just formally tested on PostgreSQL 7.2.2 (logs sent to Dave), and
> > the
> > results are perfectly inline with those from 7.2.3 : a
> massive slowdown
> > when upgrading from pgadminII 1.4.2 to 1.4.12.
>
> I thought the complaint involved PG 7.3? There is no schema
> syntax in 7.2.

<puzzled> No there isn't. pgAdmin uses the same unqualified SQL in all
cases on 7.2.x...

Regards, Dave.

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Treat 2003-01-21 15:16:31 Re: What goes into the security doc?
Previous Message Rod Taylor 2003-01-21 05:37:48 Recent initdb error