| From: | "Dave Page" <dpage(at)vale-housing(dot)co(dot)uk> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Robert Treat" <xzilla(at)users(dot)sourceforge(dot)net>, "Vince Vielhaber" <vev(at)michvhf(dot)com> |
| Cc: | "Justin Clift" <justin(at)postgresql(dot)org>, "PostgreSQL Advocacy Mailing List" <pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org>, "PostgreSQL WWW Mailing list" <pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: [Fwd: [pgsql-www] Finishing the Portal] |
| Date: | 2002-11-11 15:54:03 |
| Message-ID: | 03AF4E498C591348A42FC93DEA9661B8128BC0@mail.vale-housing.co.uk |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-advocacy |
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Robert Treat [mailto:xzilla(at)users(dot)sourceforge(dot)net]
> Sent: 11 November 2002 15:46
> To: Vince Vielhaber
> Cc: Justin Clift; PostgreSQL Advocacy Mailing List; Dave
> Page; PostgreSQL WWW Mailing list
> Subject: Re: [pgsql-advocacy] [Fwd: [pgsql-www] Finishing the Portal]
>
>
>
> I only suggested it because if we're going to have multiple
> developers doing support, we need some type of collaborative
> structure in place. If we can get the thing done in a few
> days by skipping the collaborative structure then by all
> means lets skip it and *get it done*. After that we can flame
> war ourselves on whether it should be open source, have
> multiple developers, use sourceforge, or whatever. Dave, in
> your opinion, whats the best way to tackle getting it done?
Honestly? I think it's a few hours work for one person, assuming there
are no more design changes etc. At most it maybe warrants adding to a
cvs someplace (I believe there is one for the web stuff isn't there
Vince?). I agree with Vince (now there's a first :-) ) - Gborg is
serious overkill.
Regards, Dave.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Shridhar Daithankar | 2002-11-11 15:58:52 | Re: [Fwd: [pgsql-www] Finishing the Portal] |
| Previous Message | Robert Treat | 2002-11-11 15:46:27 | Re: [Fwd: [pgsql-www] Finishing the Portal] |