Re: Win32 port

From: "Dave Page" <dpage(at)vale-housing(dot)co(dot)uk>
To: "Bruce Momjian" <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, "Steve Howe" <howe(at)carcass(dot)dhs(dot)org>
Cc: "Katie Ward" <kward(at)peerdirect(dot)com>, <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Win32 port
Date: 2002-11-08 08:21:43
Message-ID: 03AF4E498C591348A42FC93DEA9661B8128B98@mail.vale-housing.co.uk
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Bruce Momjian [mailto:pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us]
> Sent: 08 November 2002 04:54
> To: Steve Howe
> Cc: Katie Ward; pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
> Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Win32 port
>
>
>
> OK, Steve's vote is enough to indicate that most want to wait
> for PeerDirect's version before moving forward with the Win32 port.

+1

I've also been testing this for a while now - I agree with Steve, it
works *very* well.

Regards, Dave.

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Luis Alberto Amigo Navarro 2002-11-08 08:28:51 Performance on NUMA
Previous Message Steve Howe 2002-11-08 05:43:24 Re: Win32 port