From: | "Dave Page" <dpage(at)vale-housing(dot)co(dot)uk> |
---|---|
To: | "Jason Tishler" <jason(at)tishler(dot)net> |
Cc: | "Peter Eisentraut" <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, <pgsql-cygwin(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: ipc-daemon |
Date: | 2002-11-01 08:34:26 |
Message-ID: | 03AF4E498C591348A42FC93DEA9661B8128B5F@mail.vale-housing.co.uk |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-cygwin |
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jason Tishler [mailto:jason(at)tishler(dot)net]
> Sent: 01 November 2002 01:03
> To: Dave Page
> Cc: Peter Eisentraut; pgsql-cygwin(at)postgresql(dot)org
> Subject: Re: [CYGWIN] ipc-daemon
>
>
> Dave,
>
> On Thu, Oct 31, 2002 at 08:48:02AM -0000, Dave Page wrote:
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Peter Eisentraut [mailto:peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net]
> > > Sent: 30 October 2002 19:36
> > > To: pgsql-cygwin(at)postgresql(dot)org
> > > Subject: [CYGWIN] ipc-daemon
> > >
> > > I'm getting tired of the "initdb hangs" class of complaints.
> > > Why doesn't the relevant function fail if the ipc-daemon
> > > isn't running? Can anything be done in that area?
> >
> > Yes, me too. How about something like:
> >
> > [snip]
>
> I think that Peter had something else in mind. See my recent
> posts for the details.
Hi Jason,
Yours is obviously a more robust solution. I was merely offering a quick
hack to get shot of 95% of the problem reports.
Regards, Dave.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Brian Murphy | 2002-11-01 08:45:22 | Re: Cygwin: ip-daemon install service problem |
Previous Message | Jason Tishler | 2002-11-01 01:03:17 | Re: ipc-daemon |