Re: Can long-running VACUUM be interrupted?

From: Adrien NAYRAT <adrien(dot)nayrat(at)anayrat(dot)info>
To: Andrey Zhidenkov <andrey(dot)zhidenkov(at)gmail(dot)com>, <pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Can long-running VACUUM be interrupted?
Date: 2018-11-20 08:05:17
Message-ID: 039bd8a3-bae5-cdee-e310-b53112f2086f@anayrat.info
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-admin

On 11/20/18 4:58 AM, Andrey Zhidenkov wrote:
> I have long-running prevent wraparound VACUUM (it has been running for
> 6 days at the moment). The question is: if I interrupt this process in
> some way (restart database, for instance), will it start from the
> beginning? On the one hand, it opens a new transaction at the
> beginning (according to the source code), on the other hand it updates
> some data on the disk (WAL?). It confuses me. Could someone please
> explain me this?
> -
> With best regards, Andrey Zhidenkov
>

Hi Andrez,

You could interrupt with pg_cancel_backend function, but autovacuum will
restart after autovacuum_naptime delay (1min by default).

If you are 9.6+, Postgres will be able to skip already frozen row on the
table, but it will scan all indexes from the beginning.

Why do you want to interrupt? This kind of vacuum is necessary to avoid
wraparound:
https://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/routine-vacuuming.html#VACUUM-FOR-WRAPAROUND

Regards,

In response to

Browse pgsql-admin by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Stéphane KANSCHINE 2018-11-20 09:37:52 Re: pgadmin4 - session timeout problem in browser
Previous Message Häfliger Guido 2018-11-20 07:05:57 AW: logging aql queries only one table or tables of one scheme