| From: | "Adam Rich" <adam(dot)r(at)sbcglobal(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | "'brian'" <brian(at)zijn-digital(dot)com>, <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>, "'jws'" <jsacksteder(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Subject: | Re: 'greatest' function? |
| Date: | 2007-02-08 04:15:13 |
| Message-ID: | 038c01c74b37$bbeb6840$6400a8c0@dualcore |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
I don't see greatest or least anywhere on that page... But they ARE
here:
http://www.postgresql.org/docs/8.2/interactive/functions-conditional.htm
l#AEN13140
-----Original Message-----
From: pgsql-general-owner(at)postgresql(dot)org
[mailto:pgsql-general-owner(at)postgresql(dot)org] On Behalf Of brian
Sent: Wednesday, February 07, 2007 10:07 PM
To: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] 'greatest' function?
jws wrote:
> Is there any buil-in function to return the lesser of two numbers?
>
> i.e. lesser(100,125) would return 100.
>
> Do I need to roll my own?
>
Which is it--greatest or least?
No matter, TFM has something to say about it:
http://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/static/functions-math.html#FUNCTI
ONS-MATH-FUNC-TABLE
brian
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 6: explain analyze is your friend
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | jws | 2007-02-08 04:33:41 | Re: 'greatest' function? |
| Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2007-02-08 04:14:04 | Re: 'greatest' function? |