From: | "Alex Ignatov \(postgrespro\)" <a(dot)ignatov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru> |
---|---|
To: | "'Melvin Davidson'" <melvin6925(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | "'Tom Lane'" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Drop user cascade |
Date: | 2016-10-19 15:08:47 |
Message-ID: | 038401d22a1a$b10a1530$131e3f90$@postgrespro.ru |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
From: pgsql-general-owner(at)postgresql(dot)org [mailto:pgsql-general-owner(at)postgresql(dot)org] On Behalf Of Melvin Davidson
Sent: Wednesday, October 19, 2016 5:35 PM
To: Alex Ignatov (postgrespro) <a(dot)ignatov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>; pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] Drop user cascade
On Wed, Oct 19, 2016 at 10:03 AM, Alex Ignatov (postgrespro) <a(dot)ignatov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru <mailto:a(dot)ignatov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru> > wrote:
-----Original Message-----
From: pgsql-general-owner(at)postgresql(dot)org <mailto:pgsql-general-owner(at)postgresql(dot)org>
[mailto:pgsql-general-owner(at)postgresql(dot)org <mailto:pgsql-general-owner(at)postgresql(dot)org> ] On Behalf Of Tom Lane
Sent: Wednesday, October 19, 2016 4:31 PM
To: Alex Ignatov (postgrespro) <a(dot)ignatov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>
Cc: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org <mailto:pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] Drop user cascade
"Alex Ignatov \(postgrespro\)" <a(dot)ignatov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru <mailto:a(dot)ignatov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru> > writes:
> Why do Postgres have no such functionality as DROP USER CASCADE? Is
> there any reasons in that absence?
The short answer is that DROP USER couldn't reach across databases to get
rid of owned objects in other databases. See
https://www.postgresql.org/docs/9.6/static/role-removal.html
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org <mailto:pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> ) To make
changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
Some security consideration bear in mind that DROP OWNED cant delete own
objects in other DBs? In general what stops us to do inter DBs connection
like MSSQL?
--
Alex Ignatov
Postgres Professional: http://www.postgrespro.com The Russian Postgres
Company
--
Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org <mailto:pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> )
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
>In general what stops us to do inter DBs connection like MSSQL?
It currently is not generic to PostgreSQL, but you can do that with the dblink extension/functions.
--
Melvin Davidson
I reserve the right to fantasize. Whether or not you
wish to share my fantasy is entirely up to you. <http://us.i1.yimg.com/us.yimg.com/i/mesg/tsmileys2/01.gif>
I know about dblink =)
The question was – is there any caveats to not allow xross db access. Maybe some security considerations prevent to implement it.
We all know that PG = one process rules multiple DBs why not to allow direct access to another DB. We have one transaction counter and so on where is the problems if any?
--
Alex Ignatov
Postgres Professional: <http://www.postgrespro.com> http://www.postgrespro.com
The Russian Postgres Company
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Timofei Dynikov | 2016-10-19 16:27:25 | How to build custom rpm package for postgres 9.4.4 |
Previous Message | Melvin Davidson | 2016-10-19 14:34:39 | Re: Drop user cascade |