Re: REINDEX INDEX results in a crash for an index of pg_class since 9.6

From: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
To: pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org,Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>,Postgres hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: REINDEX INDEX results in a crash for an index of pg_class since 9.6
Date: 2019-05-06 03:58:53
Message-ID: 037F6AFC-73CC-41B3-A0F0-75AF5AE06372@anarazel.de
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Hi,

On May 5, 2019 8:56:58 PM PDT, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> writes:
>> On 2019-05-04 11:04:07 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
>>> I don't think we discussed exactly what "come out" means. My
>thought is
>>> to leave the test scripts in place (so they can be invoked manually
>with
>>> EXTRA_TESTS) but remove them from the schedule files.
>
>> Yea, that sounds sensible. I'll do so by tonight if you don't beat me
>to
>> it.
>
>On this coast, "tonight" is running into "tomorrow" ... you planning
>to do that soon?

I'd planned to finish cooking and eating, and then doing it. Seems like that'd be plenty early?

Andres
--
Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2019-05-06 04:00:04 Re: REINDEX INDEX results in a crash for an index of pg_class since 9.6
Previous Message Tom Lane 2019-05-06 03:56:58 Re: REINDEX INDEX results in a crash for an index of pg_class since 9.6