Re: Potential issue in ecpg-informix decimal converting functions

From: Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se>
To: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
Cc: a(dot)imamov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Potential issue in ecpg-informix decimal converting functions
Date: 2024-02-25 23:28:51
Message-ID: 0352C4C6-FA8D-4DF9-AE0C-21C2BA75E0BA@yesql.se
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> On 24 Feb 2024, at 02:15, Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> wrote:
>
> On Fri, Feb 23, 2024 at 06:03:41PM +0300, a(dot)imamov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru wrote:
>> Thank's for advice, the patch will be registered for the next commitfest.
>
> The risk looks really minimal to me, but playing with error codes
> while the logic of the function is unchanged does not strike me as
> something to backpatch as it could slightly break applications. On
> HEAD, I'm OK with that.

Yeah, I think this is for HEAD only, especially given the lack of complaints
against backbranches.

--
Daniel Gustafsson

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Michael Paquier 2024-02-25 23:37:20 Re: ExecAppendAsyncEventWait() in REL_14_STABLE can corrupt PG_exception_stack
Previous Message Josef Šimánek 2024-02-25 22:34:10 Re: [PATCH] Add --syntax to postgres for SQL syntax checking