Re: WAL-files is not removing authomaticaly

From: Laurenz Albe <laurenz(dot)albe(at)cybertec(dot)at>
To: Andrew Anderson <forumwriter007(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: "pgsql-generallists(dot)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-general(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: WAL-files is not removing authomaticaly
Date: 2021-03-16 12:21:16
Message-ID: 033b46e968f6968cb4e3591c2111aaf20ec4b067.camel@cybertec.at
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On Tue, 2021-03-16 at 09:49 +0200, Andrew Anderson wrote:
> 2021-03-16 09:44:03.997 EET [97581] [] [] [] []DEBUG: attempting to remove WAL segments older than log file 000000000000013E00000097

That was the entry I was hoping to see.

So, are all older WAL segments deleted or recycled?
Is that a reasonably recent WAL segment?

Yours,
Laurenz Albe
--
Cybertec | https://www.cybertec-postgresql.com

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andrew Anderson 2021-03-16 13:31:02 Re: WAL-files is not removing authomaticaly
Previous Message Avinash Kumar 2021-03-16 12:01:29 Re: Postgres crashes at memcopy() after upgrade to PG 13.