From: | David Hartveld <David(dot)Hartveld(at)mendix(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com> |
Cc: | "pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Streaming replication on 9.1-beta2 after pg_restore is very slow |
Date: | 2011-07-07 12:12:29 |
Message-ID: | 0317654684C3CF48B06D8FF5AE5D2EE0D257@Win-Exchange-02.MENDIXDOMAIN.local |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
> -----Oorspronkelijk bericht-----
> Van: Simon Riggs [mailto:simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com]
> Verzonden: donderdag 7 juli 2011 01:07
> Aan: David Hartveld
> CC: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
> Onderwerp: Re: [GENERAL] Streaming replication on 9.1-beta2 after pg_restore
> is very slow
>
> On Wed, Jul 6, 2011 at 4:54 PM, David Hartveld <David(dot)Hartveld(at)mendix(dot)com>
> wrote:
>
> > Is there possibly a known issue with the beta, or do I have to
> > configure my cluster differently for 9.1?
>
> Thanks for trying 9.1beta
>
> No known bugs, no differences in configuration.
>
> You haven't enabled any of the new 9.1 features either so they aren't likely to be
> at issue.
>
> So there's something pretty badly screwed up somewhere, though that looks like
> pilot error at the moment, sorry.
>
> I'd suggest starting again and see if you can get a reproduceable bug.
> I'd be very grateful if you can narrow things down to produce a tight bug report.
I've just submitted bug report 6094, with a complete description of what I have done. The replication stream is reproducibly very slow. If you need more information, let me know.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Simon Riggs | 2011-07-07 12:27:43 | Re: Streaming replication on 9.1-beta2 after pg_restore is very slow |
Previous Message | Adrian Schreyer | 2011-07-07 11:13:15 | Latency problems with simple queries |