| From: | "Christopher Kings-Lynne" <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au> |
|---|---|
| To: | "mlw" <pgsql(at)mohawksoft(dot)com>, <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: MySQL at .NET conference |
| Date: | 2003-03-20 02:12:18 |
| Message-ID: | 02fb01c2ee86$2201b200$6500a8c0@fhp.internal |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general pgsql-hackers |
> Anyway, on to MySQL. The had a booth there. I asked their technical guy
> a few questions and he seemed to have a decent understanding. When I
> asked the question, "Why would I choose MySQL over something like
> PostgreSQL?" his response was "There is one company driving MySQL. Also,
> when we do a feature we think it through and deliver it completed. The
> PostgreSQL group tends to deliver things that aren't quite right or
> incomplete." I was taken aback by this. I don't think it is completely
> true, but I wonder what you guys think.
I think it's substantially true :)
Chris
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Paul M Foster | 2003-03-20 03:10:20 | Re: Multiple backend connections |
| Previous Message | pg | 2003-03-20 01:46:12 | Re: ssl |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2003-03-20 02:23:06 | Re: Open 7.4 features |
| Previous Message | snpe | 2003-03-20 01:37:32 | Re: cursors outside transactions |