Postgres-based system to run .org registry?

From: "David De Graff" <postgresql(at)awarehouse(dot)com>
To: <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, <pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org>, <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Postgres-based system to run .org registry?
Date: 2002-10-14 19:42:37
Message-ID: 02e001c273b9$dce2a4a0$0200a8c0@ddegraffT23
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-admin pgsql-general pgsql-hackers

The Internet Society (ISOC) won the bid to replace Verisign as the .org
registry. They're going to subcontract to Afilias, who has been running the
.info registry.

See:
http://www.icann.org/announcements/announcement-14oct02.htm
http://www.afilias.info/about_afilias/dotorg/index_html
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A23669-2002Oct14.html

Is this the same group that recently asked for input on their proposal,
which specified Postgres as the registry database?

(For some reason I can't find the recent thread on their proposal on the
hackers, general or admin lists.)

Dave De Graff

Responses

Browse pgsql-admin by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2002-10-14 20:56:46 Re: [GENERAL] Postgres-based system to run .org registry?
Previous Message Tom Lane 2002-10-14 17:10:15 Re: Errors while vacuuming large tables

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Matthew C Forman 2002-10-14 19:46:11 Adding on to the end of an array
Previous Message Gregory Wood 2002-10-14 19:29:35 Re: drop constraint unnamed?

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Barry Lind 2002-10-14 20:06:44 interesting side effect of autocommit = off
Previous Message Tom Lane 2002-10-14 19:13:08 orderRules() now a bad idea?