Re: [HACKERS] Updated TODO list

From: "Gene Sokolov" <hook(at)aktrad(dot)ru>
To: "Bruce Momjian" <maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: <pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Updated TODO list
Date: 1999-07-14 07:32:57
Message-ID: 02d701becdcb$17ceda40$0d8cdac3@aktrad.ru
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

From: Bruce Momjian <maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
> > Bruce Momjian <maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> > >> DB admin has no business knowing other's passwords. The current
security
> > >> scheme is seriously flawed.
> >
> > > But it is the db passwords, not the Unix passwords.
> >
> > I think the original point was that some people use the same or related
> > passwords for psql as for their login password.
> >
> > Nonetheless, since we have no equivalent of "passwd" that would let a
> > db user change his db password for himself, it's a little silly to
> > talk about hiding db passwords from the admin who puts them in.
> >
> > If this is a concern, we'd need to add both encrypted storage of
> > passwords and a remote-password-change feature.
>
> Doing the random salt over the wire would still be a problem.

There is absolutely no technical problem with storing hashed passwords and
still sending salted hash over the wire. It was recently discussed in detail
in "Hashing passwords" thread in pgsql-hackers list.

Gene Sokolov

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Ansley, Michael 1999-07-14 07:48:01 MAX Query length
Previous Message Nuchanach Klinjun 1999-07-14 07:26:45 upgrade problem