Re: Changes in Aurora PostgreSQL for min & max_wal_size parameter

Well, I hate to be bearer of bad news, but Aurora PostgreSQL is certainly not the community version, and they really haven”t built it for data warehousing.

Sent from my iPad

> On Feb 2, 2021, at 8:32 AM, dbatoCloud Solution <dbatocloud17(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
> 
> Oh my God ! It is my time too. I am requesting them to share Dataware house specific document to optimize Aurora PostgreSQL . This is the first time I am working with this flavor earlier i used to work community version. I don't know what to do now.
>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Ashokkumar Mani (OCP12c/11g/10g/9i, AWS SAA, M103)
>
> Dubai , UAE | BLR , INDIA
>
> M: +971 54 723 0075 | +91 90086 70302 | WApp : +91 81975 99922
>
> W: https://dbatocloudsolution.blogspot.in/ | E: dbatocloud17(at)gmail(dot)com
>
>
>
>> On Tue, Feb 2, 2021 at 6:36 PM John Scalia <jayknowsunix(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>> With AWS Aurora, you’re out of luck. They really don’t allow many parameters and database parameter groups are not editable to add a new parameter. I deal with this on a daily basis.
>>
>> Sent from my iPad
>>
>> > On Feb 2, 2021, at 8:05 AM, Scott Ribe <scott_ribe(at)elevated-dev(dot)com> wrote:
>> >
>> > 
>> >>
>> >> On Feb 2, 2021, at 6:01 AM, dbatoCloud Solution <dbatocloud17(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>> >>
>> >> when I checked with AWs they are saying that we cannot increase the max_wal_size & min_wal_size
>> >
>> > Seems like you already have your answer.
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >