Re: Restoring large tables with COPY

From: "Serguei Mokhov" <sa_mokho(at)alcor(dot)concordia(dot)ca>
To: "Marko Kreen" <marko(at)l-t(dot)ee>
Cc: <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Restoring large tables with COPY
Date: 2001-12-11 18:37:03
Message-ID: 029c01c18272$d7c85e80$5dd9fea9@gunn
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

----- Original Message -----
From: Marko Kreen <marko(at)l-t(dot)ee>
Sent: Tuesday, December 11, 2001 12:38 PM

> On Tue, Dec 11, 2001 at 12:29:07PM -0500, Serguei Mokhov wrote:
> > If this thing ever gets through, shouldn't this
> >
> > > /* placeholders for the delimiters for comments */
> > > ***************
> > > *** 151,156 ****
> > > --- 153,159 ----
> > > " -h, --host=HOSTNAME database server host name\n"
> > > " -i, --ignore-version proceed even when server version mismatches\n"
> > > " pg_dump version\n"
> > > + " ­m, --maxrows=NUM max rows in one COPY command\n"
> >
> > say '-m'
> >
> > > + " ­m NUM max rows in one COPY command\n"
> >
> > and this one too?
>
> One is for systems that have 'getopt_long', second for
> short-getopt-only ones. The '-h, --host=HOSTNAME' means
> that '-h HOSTNAME' and '--host=HOSTNAME' are same.

I know, I know. I just was trying to point out a typo :)
You forgot to add '-' in the messages before 'm'.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Marko Kreen 2001-12-11 19:37:58 Re: Restoring large tables with COPY
Previous Message Stephan Szabo 2001-12-11 18:30:38 Re: pg_dump: Sorted output, referential integrity