From: | "mark" <dvlhntr(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | "'Andy'" <angelflow(at)yahoo(dot)com>, "'Marti Raudsepp'" <marti(at)juffo(dot)org> |
Cc: | <pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org>, "'Benjamin Krajmalnik'" <kraj(at)servoyant(dot)com> |
Subject: | Re: Hardware recommendations |
Date: | 2010-12-09 05:17:18 |
Message-ID: | 026901cb9760$5b367020$11a35060$@com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-performance |
-----Original Message-----
From: pgsql-performance-owner(at)postgresql(dot)org
[mailto:pgsql-performance-owner(at)postgresql(dot)org] On Behalf Of Andy
Sent: Wednesday, December 08, 2010 5:24 PM
To: Marti Raudsepp
Cc: pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org; Benjamin Krajmalnik
Subject: Re: [PERFORM] Hardware recommendations
>> > If you are IO-bound, you might want to consider using
>> SSD.
>> >
>> > A single SSD could easily give you more IOPS than 16
>> 15k SAS in RAID 10.
>>
>> Are there any that don't risk your data on power loss, AND
>> are cheaper
>> than SAS RAID 10?
>>
>Vertex 2 Pro has a built-in supercapacitor to save data on power loss. It's
spec'd at 50K IOPS and a 200GB one costs around $1,000.
Viking offers 6Gbps SAS physical connector SSD drives as well - with a super
capacitor.
I have not seen any official pricing yet, but I would suspect it would be in
the same ballpark.
I am currently begging to get some for eval. I will let everyone know if I
swing that and can post numbers.
-mark
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Divakar Singh | 2010-12-09 05:17:22 | Re: libpq vs ODBC |
Previous Message | Alex Goncharov | 2010-12-09 05:01:17 | Re: libpq vs ODBC |