| From: | Rob Sargent <robjsargent(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Igor Korot <ikorot01(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | me nefcanto <sn(dot)1361(at)gmail(dot)com>, Adrian Klaver <adrian(dot)klaver(at)aklaver(dot)com>, Laurenz Albe <laurenz(dot)albe(at)cybertec(dot)at>, "pgsql-generallists(dot)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-general(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Quesion about querying distributed databases |
| Date: | 2025-03-06 03:43:56 |
| Message-ID: | 025C57B4-F1C3-4533-86FD-D7C85EDCF143@gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
> On Mar 5, 2025, at 8:03 PM, Igor Korot jnit worked great for SQL Server. If you're small, we host them all on one server. If you get bigger, we can put heavy databases on separate machines.
>>
>> However, I don't have experience working with other types of database scaling. I have used table partitioning, but I have never used sharding.
>>
>> Anyway, that's why I asked you guys. However, encouraging me to go back to monolith without giving solutions on how to scale, is not helping. To be honest, I'm somehow disappointed by how the most advanced open source database does not support cross-database querying just like how SQL Server does. But if it doesn't, it doesn't. Our team should either drop it as a choice or find a way (by asking the experts who built it or use it) how to design based on its features. That's why I'm asking.
>>
Cross-database on MSSQL is identical to cross schema on postgres. If you truly need cross server support (versus say beefier hardware) how did you come to choose postgres? The numbers you present are impressive but not unheard of on this list.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Ron Johnson | 2025-03-06 06:22:38 | Re: Quesion about querying distributed databases |
| Previous Message | Igor Korot | 2025-03-06 03:03:10 | Re: Quesion about querying distributed databases |