From: | Rob Sargent <robjsargent(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: function defined (or not), more worries on version 10->14 upgrade |
Date: | 2022-04-15 20:01:36 |
Message-ID: | 024A7C75-C1D5-41CF-B68F-23F418E8379A@gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
> On Apr 15, 2022, at 11:14 AM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>
> Rob Sargent <robjsargent(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
>> The function in question is working but I'm having trouble getting at
>> it's current definition and the possibility that there are more v10->v14
>> issues in this database. The last ERROR: below seems to me "a system
>> thing"(tm)
>
> Hmm, it looks like \df does not cope well with spaces in the argument
> list:
>
> regression=# \df genome_threshold_mono(text,text,double)
> List of functions
> Schema | Name | Result data type | Argument data types | Type
> --------+------+------------------+---------------------+------
> (0 rows)
>
> regression=# \df genome_threshold_mono(text,text, double)
> ERROR: invalid regular expression: parentheses () not balanced
>
> It's sending the server a bogus pattern in the second case.
> I've not looked at the code yet, but this does seem like a
> psql (not server) bug.
>
> As Adrian noted, you're not supposed to use parameter names
> in \df, only their types. It seems like whitespace ought
> to be allowed though.
>
> regards, tom lane
Thank you. Much relieved.
The no-space-no-names thing is suspicious. Away from desk just now but sure I’ve successfully cutpasted the arg list into \df calls Will test shortly
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Adrian Klaver | 2022-04-15 20:22:07 | Re: function defined (or not), more worries on version 10->14 upgrade |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2022-04-15 17:14:19 | Re: function defined (or not), more worries on version 10->14 upgrade |