<<
I had thought you were saying that any one ETL procedure into one database
used 14 concurrent threads. But really, each ETL procedure is
single-threaded, and there can be up to 5 (or theoretically up to 14) of
them running at a time into different databases?
>>
Sorry, just caught this.
Your first interpretation was correct. Each DB runs an ETL that can have up
to 14 concurrent threads. I don't think the number should be that high, but
the engineering team insists the load time is better than fewer threads
running faster.