From: | "Adam Lang" <aalang(at)rutgersinsurance(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | "PGSQL General" <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Fw: Starting postmaster at boot |
Date: | 2000-09-14 20:32:14 |
Message-ID: | 023e01c01e8a$ddfdece0$330a0a0a@Adam |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
From: "Adam Lang" <aalang(at)rutgersinsurance(dot)com>
To: "Alfred Perlstein" <bright(at)wintelcom(dot)net>
Sent: Thursday, September 14, 2000 4:28 PM
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] Starting postmaster at boot
> I did, and that is why I don't understand.
>
> Adam Lang
> Systems Engineer
> Rutgers Casualty Insurance Company
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Alfred Perlstein" <bright(at)wintelcom(dot)net>
> To: "Adam Lang" <aalang(at)rutgersinsurance(dot)com>
> Cc: "PGSQL General" <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
> Sent: Thursday, September 14, 2000 4:25 PM
> Subject: Re: [GENERAL] Starting postmaster at boot
>
>
> <snip>
> > > Why is everyone else's script working without the -l and mine wasn't?
> >
> > Check su's manpage.
>
>
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Dale Walker | 2000-09-14 20:33:34 | Re: Starting postmaster at boot |
Previous Message | Dale Walker | 2000-09-14 20:30:44 | vacuum taking long time |