Re: Upgrade to dual processor machine?

From: Björn Metzdorf <bm(at)turtle-entertainment(dot)de>
To: <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Upgrade to dual processor machine?
Date: 2002-11-13 13:30:01
Message-ID: 021e01c28b18$c516b1b0$81c206d4@office.turtleentertainment.de
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general pgsql-performance

> > What would the benefit of this be? sort_mem is just an upper limit on
> > memory consumption, and that memory is only allocated on demand. So
> > there shouldn't be a difference between setting sort_mem globally to
> > some reasonable value, and manually changing it for backends that need
> > to do any sorting.
>
> Well, while that is correct, setting sort mem high only when required
would
> prevent memory exhaustion if that happens.
>
> Remember he has 5000 requests per minute with concurrent connection. Now
say
> there is a default high setting of sort mem and a connection persist for a
long
> time, it *might* accumulate memory. Personally I would not keep it high by
> default.

Could you elaborate on what exactly is a query requiring sorting (and
therefore is affected by sort_mem setting)?

Is it a SELECT with WHERE-clause using seq scan? Is it rebuilding of an
index? What else could it be?

Regards,
Bjoern

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jules Alberts 2002-11-13 13:30:48 Re: Can not connect to the database
Previous Message Shridhar Daithankar 2002-11-13 13:25:06 Re: Upgrade to dual processor machine?

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Shridhar Daithankar 2002-11-13 13:34:27 Re: Upgrade to dual processor machine?
Previous Message Shridhar Daithankar 2002-11-13 13:25:06 Re: Upgrade to dual processor machine?