Re: Opteron vs RHAT

From: "Matt Clark" <matt(at)ymogen(dot)net>
To: "'Chris Browne'" <cbbrowne(at)acm(dot)org>, <pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Opteron vs RHAT
Date: 2004-10-13 16:47:20
Message-ID: 021b01c4b144$4e822120$8300a8c0@solent
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance

> >>trainwreck... If you're going through IBM, then they won't want to
> >>respond to any issues if you're not running a
> "bog-standard" RHAS/RHES
> >>release from Red Hat.
...> To be fair, we keep on actually running into things that
> _can't_ be backported, like fibrechannel drivers that were
> written to take advantage of changes in the SCSI support in 2.6.

I thought IBM had good support for SUSE? I don't know why I thought that...

In response to

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Mark Wong 2004-10-13 18:57:44 futex results with dbt-3
Previous Message Robin Ericsson 2004-10-13 16:36:50 [Fwd: Re: [GENERAL] query problem]