Re: Re: Re: WIN32 errno patch

From: "Magnus Naeslund\(f\)" <mag(at)fbab(dot)net>
To: <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Re: Re: WIN32 errno patch
Date: 2001-08-12 17:40:55
Message-ID: 021801c12355$f07fbc60$020a0a0a@totalmef
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Forgot to CC.

Magnus
----- Original Message -----
From: "Magnus Naeslund(f)" <mag(at)fbab(dot)net>
To: "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Sent: Sunday, August 12, 2001 1:19 PM
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Re: Re: WIN32 errno patch

> From: "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
> > >> It does not even compile:
> > > Same behaviour here.
> >
> > When someone sends me a Windoze implementation of the proposed
> > SOCK_STRERROR() macro, I'll see about fixing it. Till then
> > I can't do much.
>
> As I said, the FormatMessage function is probably what we want.
> I did a non threadsafe (not a crash thing, just if SOCK_STRERROR is called
> the exact same time by two threads one thread will probably get the other
> thread's message).
>
> The code + the testcase is attached.
>
> > regards, tom lane
>
> Magnus Naeslund
>
>
>

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Allan Engelhardt 2001-08-12 18:48:50 Re: Comparing tables in different db's
Previous Message Tom Lane 2001-08-12 16:31:41 Re: [JDBC] JDBC pg_description update needed for CVS tip