From: | Andrew Kerber <andrew(dot)kerber(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | pinker <pinker(at)onet(dot)eu> |
Cc: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Huge Pages - setting the right value |
Date: | 2017-06-11 19:52:54 |
Message-ID: | 020820AA-6FFB-4B91-A582-01080F9EA09F@gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
I am sure it does not.
Sent from my iPhone
> On Jun 11, 2017, at 10:50 AM, pinker <pinker(at)onet(dot)eu> wrote:
>
> Andrew Kerber wrote
>> I can't give you an absolutely authoritative answer, but because of the
>> way hugepages are implemented and allocated, I can't think how they could
>> be used for other processes. Linux hugepages are either 2m or 1g, far too
>> large for any likely processes to require. They cannot be allocated in
>> partial pages.
>
> thank you for your help.
> My system is using 2MB pages for shared buffers. I have checked and one of
> my processes has used 606788kB of memory, so potentially could use ~ 300
> huge pages, but does postgres can use it for non shared memory?
>
>
>
>
> --
> View this message in context: http://www.postgresql-archive.org/Huge-Pages-setting-the-right-value-tp5952972p5965963.html
> Sent from the PostgreSQL - general mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
>
> --
> Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org)
> To make changes to your subscription:
> http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | chuma.ofole | 2017-06-11 20:25:53 | Unsubscription |
Previous Message | Bruno Wolff III | 2017-06-11 19:15:55 | Re: Limiting DB access by role after initial connection? |