From: | "David Johnston" <polobo(at)yahoo(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | "'Tom Lane'" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Select + Functions + Composite Types: Behavior |
Date: | 2011-02-12 23:49:36 |
Message-ID: | 01ea01cbcb0f$81de5250$859af6f0$@yahoo.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
Tom,
BTW, with the quick response you provided (THANKS!) I probably should have
pinged the list sooner in my search...
David J.
-----Original Message-----
From: Tom Lane [mailto:tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us]
Sent: Saturday, February 12, 2011 5:33 PM
To: David Johnston
Cc: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] Select + Functions + Composite Types: Behavior
"David Johnston" <polobo(at)yahoo(dot)com> writes:
> If I put a function that returns a composite type into the FROM clause
> of a SELECT query (and it - the function - is the only source for the
> query) the "*" select list expands so that there is a single record
> for each component of the composite type.
> SELECT * FROM compositereturningfunction() Yields -> 2 columns (one
> for id and one for data)
> I've read quite a bit about plpgsql and composite types and do not
> recall anything about this specific default behavior and methods to
> force
> (workaround) to the other behavior.
It's just like tables. Try
select x from compositereturningfunction() x
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | David Johnston | 2011-02-13 00:08:48 | Re: Select + Functions + Composite Types: Behavior |
Previous Message | David Johnston | 2011-02-12 23:47:06 | Re: Select + Functions + Composite Types: Behavior |