From: | "Thomas H(dot)" <me(at)alternize(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | <pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: could not rename xlog (was: BUG #2712) |
Date: | 2006-10-24 13:15:52 |
Message-ID: | 01e401c6f76e$88ae37e0$0201a8c0@iwing |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-bugs pgsql-patches |
> "Peter Brant" <Peter(dot)Brant(at)wicourts(dot)gov> writes:
>> The same problem exists in 8.1 too. See this thread
>> http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-bugs/2006-04/msg00177.php
>> Tom and Magnus tracked down a cause, but I don't think a fix was ever
>> implemented.
>
> Thomas seems to have two different issues there: the "could not rename
> file" problem on the pg_xlog file is probably explained by the mechanism
> we identified back then (and I'm not sure why no fix has been
> installed)
just had another total lockdown. the writer-process was trying to rename the
C1 to CA which failed:
2006-10-24 14:27:58 [5196] LOG: 00000: could not rename file
"pg_xlog/0000000100000004000000C1" to "pg_xlog/0000000100000004000000CA",
continuing to try
2006-10-24 14:27:58 [5196] LOCATION: pgrename, dirmod.c:142
when checking the process with process explorer, it reveals that it has this
file handles to pg_xlog open:
D:\DB\PostgreSQL-8.2\data\pg_xlog
D:\DB\PostgreSQL-8.2\data\pg_xlog\0000000100000004000000C3
under normal operation, "writer process" does not seem to have a file handle
to the xlog directory (D:\DB\PostgreSQL-8.2\data\pg_xlog)
the last error log entry prior to the lockdown was about 15min, so probably
the two problems are unrelated.
unfortunately, before i could try to get more informations, i had to restart
the pg_ctl due to the system being in half-productive mode. that leads me to
the question: what are the chances of me being helpful with getting more
informations? i can have the db run like that for some more days, but for
long term i can't babysit our application and might have to go back to 8.1.
thanks,
thomas
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Pavel | 2006-10-24 14:37:17 | BUG #2716: performance problem with enable_bitmapscan |
Previous Message | Frank Schmidt | 2006-10-24 08:46:24 | BUG #2714: Wrong Result with static number |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2006-10-24 13:39:34 | Re: [HACKERS] COPY does not work with regproc and aclitem |
Previous Message | Zdenek Kotala | 2006-10-24 12:43:20 | Re: [HACKERS] COPY does not work with regproc and aclitem |