Re: Web Development with Database

Jakarta::Tomcat can run as a service under IIS too, I forget the procedure
to set it up, but you can get more info at
http://jakarta.apache.org/tomcat/tomcat-3.3-doc/tomcat-iis-howto.html This
way you can use the JDBC to make your connections... ;-)

And I agree, DreamSleazer and FireWorst is not a development platform, IMO
it's a WYSIWYG. ColdFusion is better, but no more than a copycat to me...
[no flames please.]

Mark
----- Original Message -----
From: "Jim Caley" <caley(at)chesco(dot)com>
To: "David Link" <dlink(at)soundscan(dot)com>
Cc: "Josh Berkus" <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>; <pgsql-novice(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Sent: 17 October, 2001 1:18 PM
Subject: Re: [NOVICE] Web Development with Database

> I've been having very good results using Enhydra (see
http://www.enhydra.org, or
> specifically for the open source version, http://enhydra.enhydra.org)
This
> uses JDBC.
>
> Jim
> --
>
> David Link wrote:
> >
> > > > I'm playing around with Macromedia's Dreamweaver and ColdFusion
which
> > > > can use ODBC to connect to databases. (It can also use JDBC, OLE DB
> > > > and
> > > > has native support for Oracle and others -- not PG though :-)
> > >
> > > IMHO, Dreamweaver and Coldfusion leave a lot to be desired as real
> > > production platforms. For playing around, they've OK.
> >
> > What I have found for Web application development with Database are the
> > following solutions, in order of desirability:
> >
> > 1. Perl CGI programs using Perl:DBI for Database connectivity.
> >
> > This gives you lots of flexibility. And with Apache Perl Mod you no
> > longer need to fork a new process for every client request.
> >
> > 2. Java Server Pages (JSP) using JDBC. It requires some Java Servlet
> > Engine running along side Apache.
> >
> > This gives you lots of flexibility, although development is not as
> > fast as perl development. One could start out with Perl CGI and migrate
> > to JSPs as a project becomes more robust.
> >
> > 3. Macromedia's ColdFusion Server running along side Apache. It uses
> > ODBC. It allows the use of ColdFusion Tags to extend HTML and allow SQL
> > (among other things).
> >
> > This is about as effective as using PHP or ePerl.
> >
> > 4. Active Server Pages (ASP) by Microsoft. This requires the use of the
> > IIS web server rather than Apache. ASPs can use Microsoft's ActiveX
> > Document Object (ADO) model on top of Microsoft's OLE DB database
> > connectivity which may rely on ODBC to connect to Databases that do not
> > support M$'s OLE DB.
> >
> > Too proprietary.
> >
> > What are other people's opinions on this?
> > What is www.postgresql.org developed on?
> >
> > Thanks -David
> >
> > ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> > TIP 4: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 5: Have you checked our extensive FAQ?
>
> http://www.postgresql.org/users-lounge/docs/faq.html
>